AKA: Re-licensing
Payments of a company for removing your brand from the OSS product and re-selling it under their own brand (maybe with additional features / plugins). The open-source software is monetized by selling a license to re-license the OSS - often generating one-time income with options to generate recurring revenue.
Requires:
Variants & Options:
Characteristics | Value | Note |
---|---|---|
Effort to set-up | Weeks | Requires creation of legal documents |
Effort to maintain | Low | Depends on the popularity and size of target group |
Cost to set-up | Medium | Will require a lawyer to setup the license and contracts |
Cost to maintain | Low | Will cause costs for legal or tax related stuff (but should be covered by income) |
One-time Income | High | Depends on OSS popularity |
Recurring Income | High | Depends on OSS popularity |
Income Predictability | Medium | Might degrade if similar projects become more attractive |
Full income Threshold | 50- | |
Recipient | C | |
Additional Work | Low | Usage verification and contract negotiation |
Visibility | Low | Constant marketing necessary |
Necessity to pay | Medium | Only you can allow re-license but users can use the licensed OSS |
Entry Threshold | Medium | Requires contracts |
Countervalue | White Label | |
Scalability | Medium | Scales with the number of companies |
Effort for marketing | Medium | Depends on OSS popularity |
Competitors | None | At least not for your brand |
Software types | Special | Best for stand-alone systems with third-party users (e.g., blogs, LMS, etc.) |